AB 2257 comes into force, which stops limiting the amount of jobs they can perform per year

A new California law, which modifies another that throughout the year generated protests from journalists and musicians, among other unions – by imposing that only 35 jobs be accepted a year – came into force on September 8.

Governor GavinNewsom signed AB 2257, which partially modified A B5, both from State Assemblywoman Lorena González of San Diego.

For more than eight months, AB5 put many independent California journalists, known as free agents or freelancers, into unemployment; as well as musicians, independent truckers and small franchise owners.

AB5 indicated that if a company or employer requested more than that limit of 35 jobs from an independent employee, it would have to hire him, with all the benefits – such as vacations, health insurance and more, something that for many companies would be unaffordable .

The result was that many employers stopped seeking freelance services.

José Lebrija, a border freelancer who often works assignments commissioned by CNN, Telemundo and European channels, said AB5 “limited them.”

He indicated that some of the bases of the work of independent journalists is availability, in addition to professionalism ”.

San Diego Democratic Assemblywoman Lorena González was the one who proposed AB 5 and AB 2257.

“The media look to us because we work well, but we do not say no, regardless of the time or conditions in which we are asked for the job.”

So, working a few assignments over the course of a year “is not enough to live on. It is an attack, independent journalists would have to forget journalism and dedicate themselves to something else, because you would no longer have the availability for work, “he said.

A couple of freelance photographers in San Diego even raised the possibility of moving out of state in order to keep their jobs.

Nelly Cervantes, also a freelance reporter, said she agrees with the original meaning of AB5 but not with the part that affected independent journalists, musicians and truckers, among others.

“The fundamental lawsuit is that the transport companies by applications hide behind the argument that they are not corporations in order not to pay payroll taxes and other benefits,” he said.

“It is not about prohibiting people from working, but some companies like Uber and Lyft hide behind the fact that they are not companies, but service platforms, which means that they do not pay significant taxes to the state, nor do they contribute to unemployment insurance. ”Said the reporter.

That seems to be the change that legislator González promoted by “exempting” unions from AB5 that her law collaterally limited.

AB 2257, now effective, exempts many occupations in the media, music, and other industries from the requirements of AB 5.

When González formulated AB5, the law was backed by unions that hoped to organize hundreds of thousands of riders from Uber and Lyft rideshare services.

AB 2257 “strikes a balance but maintains protections for workers from misclassification,” Gonzalez said.

The new law also benefits independent truckers and small franchises.

The new law also sets certain requirements for freelance reporters and photographers.

Both are exempted from A B5 as long as their work is not governed by a written contract, that the freelancer does not replace a regular employee, and that he is not prohibited from working for multiple outlets.

Although AB 2257 provided exceptions, A B5 would still affect drivers for Uber, Lyft and other platform services.

These companies are currently challenging A B5 in court and promoting Proposition 22, which would also exempt drivers of app services from A B5 limitations.

The legislature passed AB 2257 in non-stop session on the last day of August along with dozens of proposed new laws.

A week later, the governor signed the law to take effect from now on.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here